Stat crux dum volvitur orbis.
They could have saved themselves by a simple stroke of the pen. Most of
their contemporaries were prepared to do so. The charge was "machinating and desiring to deprive the King of his title as
Supreme Head of the Church". John Houghton and his companions were accused of
openly declaring at the Tower of London that "the King our Sovereign Lord is
not supreme head on earth of the Church of England." Most people preferred not to see the crucial significance of this issue.
Four years earlier, Thomas Bilney had been burnt at the stake as a heretic for
disseminating some of the notions of Martin Luther. By contrast, there were
many who regarded the Oath of Supremacy, not as something which touched the
faith, but as a claim on the part of Henry VIII to the kind of supremacy in
Church and state which de facto the King of Spain possessed. In truth, of course, the question of setting proper limits to the
pretensions and the power of human government cannot fail to be significant
for followers of our pioneer Jesus Christ, who was condemned by the
authorities of his time for pointing to the transcendent claims of the
Kingdom of God. In the 20th century the great engine of destruction was
nakedly the secular state of Hitler and Stalin with its Messianic pretensions.
Once again in Germany and Russia there were Christian martyrs who said "no".
"No" is the hero's word; and this evening we salute those who had the profound
discernment and the courage to say "no". That discernment came from standing
close to the cross and seeing to the heart of the giddy whirl of political
events. Stat crux dum volvitur orbis. But what is an Anglican Bishop doing celebrating such an event? After all,
I hear a puzzled voice crying out, it was Henry who founded your Church, was
it not? Of course not. If I believed that, I would leave tomorrow. Henry was a
monster of egotism with a gift for propaganda. As the brilliant edition of
some of our most disreputable fantasies and served by some very gifted artists,
he has continued to fascinate, and even impress, posterity as he impressed and
terrified his contemporaries. John Houghton had the courage to make his
judgment on the King's claims clear while he was in the tyrant's power; and he
and his companions paid for their candour with their lives. As a matter of
historical fact, the title Supreme Head, a direct contradiction of Scripture
which names Christ as the Head of the Church, was never revived after Henry's
death. The Elizabethan legislation substituted the title of Supreme Governor. A martyr, a witness to Jesus Christ, is one who is true to his deepest self
in all circumstances. His commitment to life in all its fullness can even
demand the sacrifice of his existence. I have no doubt that we are honouring
here martyrs who deserve to be remembered with thanksgiving by the whole
Church. By the 1530s, all Europe was engulfed by the turmoil which attended the
disintegration of the old Western Church. Every one of the fragments which
were left after the explosion of that super nova were profoundly changed and
reformed in the course of the century. There were some good results – a new
relationship with lay and vernacular culture and a fresh missionary zeal. But there were some malign developments, which constitute an oecumenical
agenda for repentance and reform in our own day. There was an attempt to over-define mystery. At the time of his death in
1101, the founder of the Carthusian Order, St Bruno, re-affirmed his faith in
"the mystery of the Holy Trinity" and "the real presence of Christ in the
Eucharist" against attempts to reduce these mysteries into rationalizing
definitions. No part of the Church in the 16th century resisted the temptation
to over-define mystery in the service of inter-Christian polemic, often
accompanied by violence. The reason why the Enlightenment in Europe had such
an anti-spiritual bias is that Christian polemics played such a public part in
the destructive European civil wars of the 16th and 17th centuries. With over-definition went over-bureaucratization and an excess of law in
the Church and - most destructively for the spirit represented by John
Houghton - every part of the Church went into alliance with the new nation
states and dynasties, as they struggled in that age of cartographers to draw
lines around their territories and consolidate their rule. Over-definition of mystery; over-bureaucratization; over-identification
with nation states and dynasties - that is part of the agenda for reform and
renewal in our own day. But the blood of the martyrs renews the earth. It is good to remember
these shameful events and the courage and witness of John Houghton and his
fellow monks. I look forward to the day when we can also meet united on
Smithfield to remember the martyrs of yet another twist in the tortured story
of faith in our country. But I hope and believe that we do not meet here in
any merely antiquarian spirit. Ours is a rootless and restless time, in which
people with little ground beneath their feet could be tempted to consent to
illiberal acts by fear or gusts of indignation. It was not so very long ago
that many Europeans, who were not deeply wicked, were persuaded to go along with
communist and fascist regimes. To resist such storms of self-righteousness or
terror, we need firm anchorage in the deepest, freshest spiritual wisdom and
discernment. I believe that this wisdom and discernment is a gift which is
given to those who stand by the Cross and are given the eyes to see the
principles and values which are really worth dying for, and so living for.
Rest and glory to the martyrs of the Charterhouse. Stat crux dum volvitur orbis.Reparation - 470th Anniversary Commemoration of St John Houghton
Address by Dr Richard Chartres, Lord Bishop of London, 5 May 2005